I was recently asked, Why can’t you give young babies honey?
But just because you can doesn’t mean you should.
And on this point the NHS guidelines are very clear. You should not give honey to babies under 12 months of age because there is a risk that they might get botulism.
Bacteria, toxins and Botox
Botulism is a serious, sometimes fatal, disease caused by infection with a bacterium called Clostridium botulinum. As it grows, C. botulinum produces neurotoxins which cause a flaccid (floppy) paralysis and can result in respiratory failure. About 5-10% of cases are fatal, but infections thankfully very are rare.
Symptoms include fatigue, weakness, blurred vision and difficulty speaking and swallowing. The paralysis is ‘descending’, generally starting in the head and neck, then moving to the shoulders, arms, chest and lower limbs.
Unusually for a bacterial infection there is no fever. This reflects the fact that there’s probably only limited bacterial growth (which typically induces fever) and the potent neurotoxicity of the botulinum toxin. This toxin stops the release of the neurotransmitter acetylcholine from the nerve endings, thereby causing paralysis.
Botulinum toxin is one of the most acutely lethal toxins known. The lethal dose depends upon the route of administration, but is between 1.3 and 13 ng/kg 1.
Remember, botulinum toxin is the active ingredient in Botox.
No thanks. I’ll stick with the wrinkles 😉
Botulism cases in the UK/Europe
Botulism is a notifiable disease. Consequently, we have good data on the incidence of botulism in the UK and Europe. In 2014 there were 91 confirmed cases in the EU, with 14 cases reported in the UK between 2010 and 2014. Other than injecting drug users, a significant proportion of the cases are in infants – see below.
C. botulinum is widespread in the environment and infection usually occurs by ingestion of improperly prepared food e.g. undercooked or improperly canned foods, in which the bacteria survives.
The bacteria grows in the absence of oxygen and produces the toxin during growth. Although the toxin is heat-inactivated if properly cooked (over 85°C), the bacterium also produces heat-resistant spores during growth. These spores can withstand temperatures over 100°C for long periods and usually require both high temperatures and pressures to inactivate them.
As a consequence of this the spores are also very widespread in the environment … cue the Jaws soundtrack … just waiting to encounter the correct conditions to germinate and initiate a new round of bacterial growth (and toxin production).
Botulism cases in children
About a third of all cases of botulism are in the 0-4 age group. I’ve been unable to find a more detailed breakdown by age, but there have been 19 cases of infant (children less than 12 months old) botulism in the UK since 1978.
In many cases of infant botulism the source of the spores is unknown. However, other than well-documented cases of contaminated milk powder, honey is the only food regarded as a significant risk factor. About 60% of cases of infant botulism are in babies with a history of honey consumption 2 and, in several cases, epidemiological follow-up has confirmed that honey was the source of the infection.
Treatment is not with antibiotics as it’s the toxin that causes the symptoms, not the bacteria. Instead patients are treated with immunoglobulin (antibodies) specific for the toxin. These inactivate toxicity fast and recovery is usually complete, but can be protracted.
C. botulinum spores in honey
Oxygen inhibits the growth of C. botulinum. So do acidic conditions. Honey is acidic, with a pH of about 3.9, which is too low for the bacterium to grow. However, the spores remain viable at low pH. It is this contamination of honey with C. botulinum spores that poses a risk for infants.
It is possible to microbiologically examine honey for contamination with C. botulinum spores. When this has been done, 6-10% of honey samples tested were contaminated, with contamination levels estimated at 5 to 80 spores per gram of honey. The infectious dose for a human is estimated at 10-100 spores 3.
So … much less than one teaspoon of contaminated honey.
Despite this, there is no requirement for honey to carry a label warning that it should not be fed to infants. Instead, the Food Standards Agency recommend honey carries a warning that it is unsuitable for children under one year of age.
Why is infant botulism so rare?
If up to 10% of honey is contaminated with C. botulinum spores, why are there not many more cases of botulism in infants? After all, European paediatricians have even been known to recommend honey – a long-standing traditional solution – as a means of soothing crying babies4.
The intestine of the developing baby is full of bacteria – the so-called commensal microbiota – all competing to get established and to lead a long, happy and healthy association with their human host. The spores of C. botulinum have to germinate and establish an infection in the face of this competition and, usually, they fail. A likely possibility is that infant botulism only occurs in babies in which the commensal microbiota have not properly developed … either because they are so young, because broad-spectrum antibiotic use has prevented the development of the microbiota or for a pre-existing genetic condition.
- That’s 1.3 x 10-9g … or to put it another way, 1g is sufficient to kill about 7.5 million people.
- Which of course does not mean that honey was the source.
- Arnon, S.S. (1992). Infant botulism. In Textbook of pediatric infectious disease, Feigen, RD and Cherry JD (eds), pp.1095- 1102. 3rd Edition. WB Saunders, Philadelphia USA.
- Ramenghi LA, Amerio G, Sabatini G. Honey, a palatable substance for infants: from De Rerum Natura to evidence-based medicine. Eur J Pediatr 2001;160:677–8.
Eh, as far as I can recall this warning came about after one case of botulism in USA some 30 years ago. Some beeker there had left a super on the ground and or picked up botulism. Never again has there been another incident.
I’m afraid that’s wrong Hans … see the links in the section on infant botulism above. It’s very, very rare, but it does happen. With molecular epidemiology it’s possible to check the infant and the spores in the honey and demonstrate whether it’s the source or not. The CDC recommend that infants are not given honey.
-a common mistake even among scientists! Also worth making it clear that adults don’t get botulism from honey because our gut bacteria are already well established and out-compete the baddies.
Aargh! Many thanks Peggy. That’s what happens when you write late at night … 🙂
I think your last point is really covered in the final paragraphs.
Great explanation, thanks. Bear in mind that Google sometimes uses something called a ‘featured snippet’ which displays a small section of your post in the search results. This could lead to people seeing only the first couple of sentences ending You can’ without clicking through and reading the whole explanation! And you can’t test this yourself as everyone sees slightly different search results at different times.
Thanks Emily (only just seen this after returning from my holidays) … I use an SEO manager that should handle this correctly by telling Google what to return in searches. I’ve checked and it does return what I intended (thankfully), rather than just the opening lines of the post.
Ah great, the preview looks good.
I feel as if you are muddying the waters a bit. My understanding is that Botulism and Infant Botulism are two different phenomena: the first is due to C botulinum growing outside the body and someone ingesting the toxin; this can happen to anyone. Infant botulism is due to the development of C botulinum inside the body of someone, almost always under 6 months old. Honey is only implicated infant botulism which, as you have pointed out, only occurs vanishingly rarely in UK – less than one case per year in the entire country. Almost all GPs have never seen it!
I can’t help but feel there is a bit of a mis-perception of risk in relation to honey and infant botulism, inflated by sensationalist reporting. Personally, I would avoid giving honey to young children so that they do not develop a sweet tooth (I cite my own teeth as evidence for the prosecution!), but that seems to me a more relevant factor than the minute risk of a disease that almost never happens
Thanks for this and the follow-up. I’m not sure how it muddies the waters. Both are caused by the toxin, but – as I think is clear – it’s ingestion of spores in honey that leads to infection and toxin production. It’s very, very rare (as I make clear) but the CDC and NHS recommendation is that honey isn’t given to infants. It’s not clear whether you think this is sensationalist reporting … it’s certainly not meant to be.
PS I should add … my own honey does not carry a warning.