Diutinus bees

Diutinus is Latin for long-lasting.

Diutinus bees are therefore long-lasting bees. These are the bees that, in temperate regions, maintain the colony through the winter to the warmer days of spring.

I’ve discussed the importance of these bees recently., and I’ve regularly made the case that protecting these ‘long-lived’ bees from the ravages of Varroa-vectored viruses is critical to reduce overwintering colony losses.

Winter is coming …

In most cases the adjective diutinus is replaced with ‘winter’, as in winter bees; it’s a more familiar term and emphasises the time of year these bees are present in the hive. I’ll generally use the terms interchangeably in this post.

Diutinus does not mean winter

From a scientific standpoint, the key feature of these bees is that they can live for up to 8 months, in contrast to the ~30 days a worker bee lives in spring or summer. If you are interested in what induces the production of long-lived bees and the fate of these bees, then the important feature is their longevity … not the season.

Furthermore, a proper understanding of the environmental triggers that induce the production of long-lived bees might mean they could be produced at other times of the season … a point with no obvious practical beekeeping relevance, but one we’ll return to in passing.

It’s worth emphasising that diutinus bees are genetically similar to the spring/summer bees (which for convenience I’ll refer to as ‘summer bees’ for the rest of the post). Despite this similarity, they have unique physiological features that contribute to their ability to thermoregulate the winter cluster for months and to facilitate spring build-up as the season transitions to spring.

What induces the production of winter bees? Is it a single environmental trigger, or a combination of factors? Does summer bee production stop and winter bee production start? What happens at the end of the winter to the winter bees?

Segueing into winter bee production 

The graph below shows the numbers of bees of a particular age present in the hive between the end of August and early December.

Colony age structure from August to December – see text for details

Each distinct colour represents bees reared in a particular 12 day ‘window’. All bees present before the 31st of August are blue. The next 12 day cohort of bees are yellow etc. The area occupied by each colour indicates the number of bees of a particular age cohort.

Note that egg laying (black) is negligible between early October and late November when it restarts.

The graph shows that that there is no abrupt change from production of summer bees to production of winter bees.

For example, about 95% of the blue bees have disappeared by December 1. Of the yellow bees, which first appeared in mid-September, about 33% are present in December. Finally, the majority of the lime coloured bees, that first put in an appearance in early October, are present at the end of December.

The colony does not abruptly stop producing short-lived summer bees on a particular date and switch to generating long-lived ‘diutinus’ winter bees. Instead, as late summer segues into early autumn, fewer short lived bees and more long lived bees are produced. 

Note that each cohort emerge from eggs laid 24 days earlier. The orange cohort emerging from 24/09 to 05/10 were laid within the first two weeks of September. This emphasises the need to treat early to reduce mite levels sufficiently to protect the winter bees.

Winter bees are like nurse bees but different

Before we consider what triggers the production of diutinus bees we need to discuss how they differ from summer bees, both nurses and foragers.

Other than being long-lived what are their characteristics?

Interaction of key physiological factors in nurse (green), forager (red) and winter bees (blue). Colored disks indicate the relative abundance of each factor.

The four key physiological factors to be considered are the levels of juvenile hormone (JH), vitellogenin (Vg) and hemolymph proteins and the size of the hypopharyngeal gland (HPG).

As summer nurse bees transition to foragers the levels of JH increases and Vg decreases. This forms a negative feedback loop; as Vg levels decrease, JH levels increase. Nurse bees have high levels of hemolymph proteins and large HPG, the latter is involved in the production of brood food fed to larvae.

So if that describes the summer nurse bees and foragers, what about the winter bees?

Winter bees resemble nurse bees in having low JH levels, high levels of VG and hemolymph proteins and large HPG’s. 

Winter bees differ from nurse bees in being long lived. A nurse bee will mature into a forager after ~3 weeks. A winter bee will stay in a physiologically similar state for months.

There have also been time course studies of JH and Vg levels through the winter. In these, JH levels decrease rapidly through October and November and are at a minimum in mid-January, before rising steeply in February and March.

As JH levels rise, levels of Vg and hemolymph proteins decrease and the size of the HPG decreases i.e. as winter changes to early spring winter bees transition to foragers.

Now we know what to look for (JH, Vg levels etc) we can return to think about the environmental triggers that cause these changes.

No single trigger

In temperate regions what distinguishes winter from autumn or spring? 

Temperatures are lower in winter.

Daylength (photoperiod) is shorter in winter.

There is less pollen and nectar (forage) available in winter.

Under experimental conditions it’s quite difficult to change one of these variables without altering others. For example, shifting a colony to a cold room (i.e. lowering the ambient temperature to <10°C) leads to a rapid decrease in JH levels (more winter bee-like). However, the cold room was dark, so perhaps it was daylength that induced the change? Alternatively, a secondary consequence of moving the colony is that external forage was no longer available, which could account for the changes observed.

And forage availability will, inevitably, influence brood rearing.


Reducing photoperiod alone does induce some winter bee-like characteristics, such as increases in the protein and lipid content of the fat bodies. It also increases resistance to cold and starvation. It can even cause clustering at elevated (~19°C) temperatures. However, critically, a reduced photoperiod alone does not appear to make the bees long lived. 

Remember also that a reduced photoperiod will limit foraging, so reducing the nutritional status of the colony. This is not insignificant; pollen trapping 2 in the autumn accelerates the production of winter bees.

But again, this may be an indirect effect. Reduced pollen input will lead to a reduction in brood rearing. Feeding pollen to broodless winter colonies induces egg-laying by the queen.

Brood, brood pheromones and ethyl oleate

One of the strongest clues about what factor(s) induces winter bee production comes from studies of free-flying summer colonies from which the brood is removed. In these, the workers rapidly change to physiologically resemble winter bees 3.

How does the presence of brood prevent the generation of diutinus bees?

There are some studies which demonstrate that the micro-climate generated in the colony by the presence of brood – elevated temperature (35°C) and 1.5% CO2 – can influence JH levels. 

However, brood also produces pheromones – imaginately termed brood pheromone – which does all sorts of things in the colony. I’ve discussed brood pheromone previously in the context of laying workers. The brood pheromone inhibits egg laying by worker bees.

Brood pheromone also contributes to a enhancement loop; it induces foraging which results in increased brood rearing and, consequently, the production of more brood pheromone.

One way brood pheromone induces foraging is by speeding the maturation of middle-aged hive bees into foragers. Conversely, when raised in the absence of brood, bees have higher Vg levels, start foraging later and live longer.

But it’s not only brood that produces pheromones.

Workers also produce ethyl oleate, a pheromone that slows the maturation of nurse bees, so reducing their transition to foragers.

A picture is worth a thousand words

All of the above is quite complicated.

Individual factors, both environmental and in the hive, have direct and indirect effects. Experimentally it is difficult to disentangle these. However, Christina Grozinger and colleagues have produced a model which encapsulates much of the above and suggests how the production of winter bees is regulated. 

Proposed model for regulation of production of winter bees.

During autumn there is a reduction in forage available coupled with a reduced daylength and lower environmental temperatures. Consequently, there is less foraging by the colony. 

Since more foragers are present within the hive, the nurse bees are exposed to higher levels of ethyl oleate, so slowing their maturation.

There’s less pollen being brought into the colony (reduced nutrition), so brood production decreases and so does the level of brood pheromone. The reduced levels of brood pheromone also reduces nurse bee maturation.

As shown in the diagram, all of these events are in a feedback loop. The reduction in levels of brood pheromone further reduces the level of foraging … meaning more foragers are ‘at home’, so increasing the effects of ethyl oleate.

All of these events have the effect of retarding worker bee maturation. The workers remain as ‘nurse-like’ long-lived winter bees.

Is that all?

The difference between nurse bees and winter bees is their longevity … or is it?

In the description above, and in most of the experiments conducted to date, the key markers of the levels of JH, Vg and hemolymph proteins, and the size of the HPG, are what has been studied. 

I’d be astounded if there are not many additional changes. 

Comparison of workers and queen bees have shown a large range of epigenetic changes induced by the differences in the diet of young larvae 4. Epigenetic changes are modifications to the genetic material that change gene expression.

I would not be surprised if there were epigenetic changes in winter bees, perhaps induced by alteration of the protein content of their diet as larvae, that influence gene expression and subsequent longevity. Two recent papers suggest that this may indeed happen; the expression of the DNA methyltransferases (the enzymes that cause the epigenetic modifications) differs depending upon the demography of the colony 5 and there are epigenetic changes between the HPG in winter bees and bees in spring 6.

Clearly there is a lot more work required to fully understand the characteristics of winter bees and how they are determined.

Don’t forget …

It’s worth emphasising that the local environment (forage and weather in particular) and the strain of the bees 7 will have an influence on the timing of winter bee production.

Last week I discussed a colony in my bee shed that had very little brood on the 2nd of October (less than one side of one frame). When I checked the colonies last weekend (11th) there were almost no bees flying and no pollen coming in. A colleague checked an adjacent colony on Monday (13th) and reported it was completely broodless. These bees are ‘local mongrels’, selected over several years to suit my beekeeping.

Early autumn colonies

In contrast, my colonies on the west coast are still busy. These are native black bees. On the 14th they were still collecting pollen and were still rearing brood. 

The calendar dates in the second figure (above) are therefore largely irrelevant.

The transition from summer bees to the diutinus winter bees will be happening in your colonies, sooner or later. I suspect it’s already completed in my Fife bees.

Whether genetics or environment has a greater influence on winter bee production remains to be determined. However, I have previously described the good evidence that local bees are better adapted to overwintering colony survival.

To me, this suggests that the two are inextricably linked; locally selected bees are better able to exploit the environment in a timely manner to ensure the colony has the winter bees needed to get the colony through to spring.



  1. These proportions have been determined using the well-known statistical method known as guesstimating. The actual amounts aren’t too important, it’s the trend that matters.
  2. By which I mean preventing returning foragers from storing pollen in the brood nest by collecting it in a trap as they enter the hive.
  3. This makes evolutionary sense to me. I presume it occurs to get the colony through a prolonged period of nectar or pollen dearth. Without this increased longevity the colony would rapidly shrink in size and its long-term viability might be compromised after 3-4 weeks.
  4. See Chittka & Chittka, 2010, and references therein.
  5. See Cardoso-Júnior et al., 2018. and an earlier paper on gene expression changes by Eyer et al., 2017 which shows that young workers reduce the longevity of nestmates.).
  6. See Wang et al., 2020.
  7. A catch-all phrase meaning the particular genetic background of your bees. This doesn’t just mean Buckfast vs. Carniolan, but also means your local mongrels vs. your neighbours.

18 thoughts on “Diutinus bees

  1. Helen Tworkowski

    Hi, thanks for a really interesting piece. I wondered if you had any thoughts on the Italian practice of placing the queen in a cage, during or just before the main flow, for 28 days. At the end of this period the colony is treated for phoretic varroa mites. One of the effects is a significant increase in honey yield compared with none caged colonies. It appears that the lack of brood is increasing foraging? Maybe speeding up the aging? Any thoughts?

    1. David Post author

      Hello Helen

      This is something I’d hoped to investigate this year had the season not been so disrupted. I’ve previously noted that some queenless colonies collected ‘extra’ nectar. However, I wasn’t sure whether it was chance or a response to a lack of a queen, or lack of brood. I’ve got a couple of those frame cages and was going to use these and a foundationless frame of drone comb to trap excess mites, discarding the drones before they emerge and then monitoring phoretic mite levels. This is slightly different from the Italian practice I think. Whether the latter changes the production of diutinus bees isn’t clear to me – the colonies will not be broodless until the last week of the 28 day ‘treatment’ period, and will have unsealed brood for the first 8-9 days.

      Something (else) for next season now 🙁

      1. vince poulin

        Helen and David – this is a very interesting set of comments. Help me out – you have a hive within which the queen is excluded from the colony using something like the frame cage David showed. A homemade cage could made using a piece of queen excluder. One option would be to have the excluder contain a frame of drone comb. The queen is sequestered for 28-days. She remains in the hive with access only to the enclosed drone comb. The remainder of the hive happily goes about their business while all eggs, larvae, and pupae – complete their life cycle leaving the hive without capped brood by the end day-28. At that time the hive is “broodless” and all mites phoretic. We treat for phoretic mites. Give the treatment some number of days and release the queen. The queen has been sequestered on drone comb and has over time produced a frame of capped drone cells that are monitored and removed before hatching so as to eliminate mites contained within the drone trap. This can be timed so as to not expose the queen to the mite treatment. The colony does not cease nectar collection. Brilliant if I have this correct.

        1. David Post author

          Hi Vince

          I’ll write something about this next season. It’s worth emphasising that the drone brood frame that you trap the queen with must be discarded before the drones emerge. That means you’d need to discard the frame soon after it’s all capped and replace it with another. Here’s a version showing a diagram produced by the National Bee Unit (PDF). You can also combine the method with oxalic acid treatment to knock back phoretic mite numbers.


          1. vince poulin

            David – this without question is on the books for next season as well. Mites so bad this year that additional strategies needed. You know I am familiar with OA but will give Amitraz a try next year. OA will work well with this strategy (queen sequestering) and yes, understand that swapping out the drone comb after they are capped will provide up to two opportunities for trapping mites within the 28-day period. OA has worked well for me on packages with most mites cleaned within a single treatment. It does have its limitations when capped cells are present. I’m on Day-3 of an OA8 treatment on my last remaining 2020 hive and still high numbers (64). It doesn’t look good. Total to date is 2800. This puts it past past a good prognosis threshold based on total counts from other collapsed hives. However, not over “Until the Fat Lady sings”. Your awareness and knowledge has been invaluable, thanks greatly.

          2. David Post author

            Hi Vince

            We’ve “saved” hives with mite counts double that using Amitraz and suitable interventions but not at this time of year. These have subsequently overwintered successfully with low viral loads. However, that was mid-season and I fear the winter bees will have been exposed. Definitely worth continuing though and always good to have a Plan B for the next season.


    2. fred

      never heard of that and i bet its got a cool Italian name for the practice. do you know anything else about it? would the workers not simpy fill the now rapidly emptying brood frames cells with nectar and bung up the nest for later laying? its certainly sounds worth a try though (by you, David!)

      1. David Post author

        Hi Fred

        I’m already planning next season. I’m not sure I’ll have time to include this in the plans but I will have a rummage through my notes to see if I’ve got any more definitive records than my increasingly dodgy memory.

        I’ll let Helen respond with the cool Italian name (or make up something that sounds likely).


  2. Julian Cox

    Thanks. Fascinating stuff.
    2 questions spring to mind.
    1) How does one know if one’s colonies are “local” (caught from swarms or even if sold as “local”).
    2) With epigenetics, will bees adapt to climate change? I’m not sure beekeepers can as local experts still talking of discreet seasons! In the south-west it appears we have summer in late April to June and then increasing frequency of rain and wind with gradual drop in temp through to March following year.

    1. David Post author

      Hello Julian

      1. The bottom line is you don’t unless you rear queens yourself and are sufficiently isolated there’s no chance of an imported drone contributing to the progeny. Many ‘local’ bees sold as nucs – particularly early in the season – are nothing of the sort. They’re a few frames of overwintered bees and an imported queen from Greece, Italy or Cyprus. I intend to write more about this during the winter.
      2. Epigenetic changes will be subjected to the same overall selection events as genetic changes – the methylation events that change gene expression can be selected as beneficial, or against if detrimental. Whether these will contribute to adaptation remains to be seen. What is very clear though is that different strains of bees from different localities are better able to cope with the local weather – it’s going to be ~10 degrees (C) today here with some light rain. I’m pretty certain my bees will be out collecting late season pollen (something bright yellow, no idea what it is). Under similar conditions on the east coast they’d mostly stay at home. And who can blame them 😉


  3. Jane

    Thanks for another interesting post. I was wondering if part of the main article has got caught up in footnote 4 by mistake?

    1. David Post author

      Many thanks Jane

      Well spotted! That’s what happens when you write late at night. Now fixed. Over 1000 readers have accessed that page since Friday and you’re the first to notice … or at least the first to point out my mistake.

      Best Wishes

  4. Dave Stokes

    Thanks for a fascinating treatise, as usual, though much of it is beyond me.
    If I understand this correctly, this would account for my observations that a queenless colony seems to live far longer the the 6 weeks “maximum” lifespan of a summer worker.

    1. David Post author

      Hello Dave

      Almost certainly … but once the brood has all gone and the remaining workers are longer lived then the problems start as the lack of brood pheromone means laying workers 🙁

      The final diagram (the ‘model’) sums things up quite nicely showing how the feedback works, reducing brood pheromone, which reduces foraging, so reducing nutrition leading to less brood … and at the same time delaying worker maturation to generate the long lived bees.


  5. Elaine Robinson

    Thanks David, really good summary. I recently read an interesting paper highlighting that pollen (reduction) is a major trigger to production of winter bees by Heather Matilla, just in case you haven’t seen it. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/j.1365-2311.2007.00904.

    I’ve mentioned in a comment in one of your previous posts on winter bees, that even in the same apiary, all with young queens, with presumably similar access to pollen, there are big differences in the timing of brood cessation, suggesting other factors other than queen age and pollen availability is at play. 3 of my 10 colonies stopped rearing brood early September and hadn’t resumed by my last inspection early Oct. I still have one colony bringing in tonnes of pollen. This has the ‘youngest’ queen in the apiary mated in August. Supports your point about v young queens rearing bees late into autumn.
    Thanks again for a thought provoking post

    1. David Post author

      Hi Elaine

      Your link is broken I think, but I know the paper. I referred to the experiment (” … pollen trapping in the autumn accelerates the production of winter bees”), but didn’t cite the paper.

      The full paper is: Dwindling pollen resources trigger the transition to broodless populations of long-lived honeybees each autumn by MATTILA HR, OTIS GW in Ecological Entomology, 32(5):496-505 DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2311.2007.00904.x AGR: IND43955351 (but the link currently appears broken … sorry).


Comments are closed.